Side by sideSuburb comparison

Garradunga vs Fitzgerald Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Fitzgerald Creek edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Fitzgerald Creek (878) sits above Garradunga (866). Garradunga skews owner-occupied (89%), Fitzgerald Creek runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Fitzgerald Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (878 vs 866).

Common questionsGarradunga vs Fitzgerald Creek

Common questions

Does Garradunga or Fitzgerald Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Fitzgerald Creek scores 878 vs 866 in Garradunga. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Garradunga
Metric
Fitzgerald Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
89.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
170
Population
98
36
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
8
866
Avg ICSEA
878

Climate

2065 mm
Annual rainfall
2065 mm
31.5°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.5°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).