Gilgooma vs Coonamble

Coonamble scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 70/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

Buying in Gilgooma or Coonamble?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Gilgooma? The free selling guide

Gilgooma and Coonamble side by side

MeasureGilgoomaCoonamble
Price and market
Median house–$187,500
Median unit–$143,280
House price change, 12 months–-6.2%
Renting
Owner occupied67.0%60.0%
Renter occupied–33.0%
Schools
Schools nearby33
Average ICSEA792792
Lifestyle and people
Walk score070
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population442,666
Median age3738
Climate
Annual rainfall492 mm513 mm
Mean max, January35.1°C35.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Coonamble has a heavier family-household mix (64% vs 53%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Gilgooma vs Coonamble: common questions

Which is more walkable, Gilgooma or Coonamble?

Coonamble scores 70/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.