Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gilmandyke vs Mount David.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Gilmandyke edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gilmandyke (973) sits above Mount David (954). Mount David skews owner-occupied (56%), Gilmandyke runs more rental-dense (44% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Gilmandyke edges out on average school ICSEA (973 vs 954).

Common questionsGilmandyke vs Mount David

Common questions

Does Gilmandyke or Mount David have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gilmandyke scores 973 vs 954 in Mount David. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Gilmandyke
Metric
Mount David

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$185/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$230/wk
44.0%
Owner occupied
56.0%
33.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
17
Population
51
47
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
7
973
Avg ICSEA
954

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).