Gilmore vs Calwell.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $845,000 and $845,000. Gilmore edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Gilmore and Calwell have near-identical medians ($845,000 vs $845,000).
Gilmore scores higher on walkability (26/100 vs 18/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gilmore (1039) sits above Calwell (1032).
For buyers
The two suburbs land at similar price points ($845,000 vs $845,000), so the buying decision usually comes down to lifestyle fit rather than affordability.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Gilmore edges out on average school ICSEA (1039 vs 1032).
Common questions
Does Gilmore or Calwell have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gilmore scores 1039 vs 1032 in Calwell. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Gilmore or Calwell?
Gilmore scores 26/100 on walkability vs 18/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Gilmore against another suburb