Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gladstone vs Barney Point.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Barney Point edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Barney Point scores higher on walkability (16/100 vs 18/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsGladstone vs Barney Point

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Gladstone or Barney Point?

Barney Point scores 18/100 on walkability vs 16/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Gladstone
Metric
Barney Point

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$275/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$275/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$420/wk
Owner occupied
46.0%
Renter occupied
51.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

16
Walk score
18
0
Transit score
10
75
Bike score
80
55,339
Population
1,065
36
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

12
Schools nearby
12
969
Avg ICSEA
969

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).