Gladstone vs Laura

Laura scores higher on walkability (4/100 vs 30/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gladstone (998) sits above Laura (981).

Buying in Gladstone or Laura?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Gladstone? The free selling guide

Gladstone and Laura side by side

MeasureGladstoneLaura
Renting
House rent$205/wk$280/wk
Unit rent$950/wk$170/wk
Owner occupied74.0%73.0%
Renter occupied17.0%22.0%
Schools
Schools nearby35
Average ICSEA998981
Lifestyle and people
Walk score430
Transit score00
Bike score015
Population745765
Median age5148
Climate
Annual rainfall417 mm458 mm
Mean max, January32.1°C32.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Gladstone edges out on average school ICSEA (998 vs 981).

Gladstone vs Laura: common questions

Does Gladstone or Laura have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gladstone scores 998 vs 981 in Laura. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Gladstone or Laura?

Laura scores 30/100 on walkability vs 4/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.