Side by sideSuburb comparison

Glastonbury vs Lower Wonga.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Glastonbury edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Glastonbury (971) sits above Lower Wonga (934).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Glastonbury edges out on average school ICSEA (971 vs 934).

Common questionsGlastonbury vs Lower Wonga

Common questions

Does Glastonbury or Lower Wonga have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Glastonbury scores 971 vs 934 in Lower Wonga. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Glastonbury
Metric
Lower Wonga

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$273/wk
83.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
8.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
Transit score
Bike score
365
Population
310
43
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
5
971
Avg ICSEA
934

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).