Side by sideSuburb comparison

Glen Echo vs Woolooga.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Glen Echo edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Glen Echo (938) sits above Woolooga (922). Glen Echo skews owner-occupied (107%), Woolooga runs more rental-dense (82% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Glen Echo edges out on average school ICSEA (938 vs 922). Glen Echo also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 77%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGlen Echo vs Woolooga

Common questions

Does Glen Echo or Woolooga have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Glen Echo scores 938 vs 922 in Woolooga. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Glen Echo
Metric
Woolooga

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$251/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$243/wk
107.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
49
Population
310
51
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
4
938
Avg ICSEA
922

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).