Side by sideSuburb comparison

Glen Isla vs Mount Marlow.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Marlow edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Marlow (994) sits above Glen Isla (986). Mount Marlow skews owner-occupied (81%), Glen Isla runs more rental-dense (33% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Marlow edges out on average school ICSEA (994 vs 986). Mount Marlow also has a higher family-household share (81% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGlen Isla vs Mount Marlow

Common questions

Does Glen Isla or Mount Marlow have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Marlow scores 994 vs 986 in Glen Isla. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Glen Isla
Metric
Mount Marlow

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$280/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$375/wk
33.0%
Owner occupied
81.0%
Renter occupied
9.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
43
Population
161
50
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
4
986
Avg ICSEA
994

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).