Side by sideSuburb comparison

Glenburnie vs Square Mile.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Square Mile edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Square Mile (962) sits above Glenburnie (961).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Square Mile edges out on average school ICSEA (962 vs 961). Square Mile also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 80%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGlenburnie vs Square Mile

Common questions

Does Glenburnie or Square Mile have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Square Mile scores 962 vs 961 in Glenburnie. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Glenburnie
Metric
Square Mile

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$180/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$180/wk
84.0%
Owner occupied
78.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
396
Population
31
45
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
14
961
Avg ICSEA
962

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).