Side by sideSuburb comparison

Glenning Valley vs Kangy Angy.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Glenning Valley edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Glenning Valley (1009) sits above Kangy Angy (990). Glenning Valley skews owner-occupied (86%), Kangy Angy runs more rental-dense (72% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Glenning Valley edges out on average school ICSEA (1009 vs 990). Glenning Valley also has a higher family-household share (83% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGlenning Valley vs Kangy Angy

Common questions

Does Glenning Valley or Kangy Angy have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Glenning Valley scores 1009 vs 990 in Kangy Angy. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Glenning Valley
Metric
Kangy Angy

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$385/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$460/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$360/wk
86.0%
Owner occupied
72.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied
17.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
10
Bike score
70
2,023
Population
331
41
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1009
Avg ICSEA
990

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).