Side by sideSuburb comparison

Goodar vs Kurumbul.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Goodar edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Goodar (962) sits above Kurumbul (867). Kurumbul skews owner-occupied (60%), Goodar runs more rental-dense (29% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Goodar edges out on average school ICSEA (962 vs 867).

Common questionsGoodar vs Kurumbul

Common questions

Does Goodar or Kurumbul have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Goodar scores 962 vs 867 in Kurumbul. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Goodar
Metric
Kurumbul

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$150/wk
$251/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$280/wk
29.0%
Owner occupied
60.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied
40.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
101
Population
36
29
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
6
962
Avg ICSEA
867

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).