Side by sideSuburb comparison

Goodger vs Taabinga.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Taabinga edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Taabinga (957) sits above Goodger (938).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Taabinga edges out on average school ICSEA (957 vs 938). Goodger also has a higher family-household share (90% vs 78%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGoodger vs Taabinga

Common questions

Does Goodger or Taabinga have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Taabinga scores 957 vs 938 in Goodger. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Goodger
Metric
Taabinga

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$305/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$288/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
25.0%
Renter occupied
12.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
176
Population
601
47
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
6
938
Avg ICSEA
957

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).