Side by sideSuburb comparison

Goolman vs Mutdapilly.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Goolman edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Goolman (1003) sits above Mutdapilly (969). Mutdapilly skews owner-occupied (80%), Goolman runs more rental-dense (69% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Goolman edges out on average school ICSEA (1003 vs 969). Mutdapilly also has a higher family-household share (85% vs 56%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsGoolman vs Mutdapilly

Common questions

Does Goolman or Mutdapilly have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Goolman scores 1003 vs 969 in Mutdapilly. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Goolman
Metric
Mutdapilly

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$370/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$290/wk
$315/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
69.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
Renter occupied
13.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
47
Population
308
41
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
20
1003
Avg ICSEA
969

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).