Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gumma vs Grassy Head.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Grassy Head edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Grassy Head (945) sits above Gumma (939). Gumma skews owner-occupied (88%), Grassy Head runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Grassy Head edges out on average school ICSEA (945 vs 939).

Common questionsGumma vs Grassy Head

Common questions

Does Gumma or Grassy Head have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Grassy Head scores 945 vs 939 in Gumma. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Gumma
Metric
Grassy Head

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$290/wk
$315/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$288/wk
88.0%
Owner occupied
63.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied
28.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
486
Population
85
52
Median age
59

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
4
939
Avg ICSEA
945

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).