Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gumma vs Macksville.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,100,000 and $620,000.

Macksville (median $620,000) is roughly 77% cheaper to buy into than Gumma ($1,100,000). Over the past year, Gumma (+16.1%) ran 13.6 percentage points ahead of Macksville (+2.5%) on house-price growth.

Macksville scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 24/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gumma (939) sits above Macksville (924). Gumma skews owner-occupied (88%), Macksville runs more rental-dense (66% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Macksville is the lower entry point at $620,000 median, 77% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Macksville delivers the better gross yield (4.85% vs 2.73%), but Gumma has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Gumma edges out on average school ICSEA (939 vs 924).

Common questionsGumma vs Macksville

Common questions

Is Gumma or Macksville cheaper to buy in?

Macksville has the lower median house price at $620,000, roughly 77% below Gumma ($1,100,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Gumma or Macksville?

Over the past 12 months, Gumma grew +16.1% vs +2.5% in Macksville, a gap of 13.6 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Gumma or Macksville have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gumma scores 939 vs 924 in Macksville. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Gumma or Macksville?

Macksville scores 24/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Gumma or Macksville?

Gross rental yield on houses is 4.85% in Macksville vs 2.73% in Gumma. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Gumma
Metric
Macksville

Price & Market

$1,100,000
Median house
$620,000
$221,760
Median unit
$221,760
+16.1%
Annual growth (house)
+2.5%
Days on market

Rental

$578/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$578/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
88.0%
Owner occupied
66.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
24
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
40
486
Population
2,782
52
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
6
939
Avg ICSEA
924

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).