Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gunderman vs Lower Hawkesbury.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lower Hawkesbury edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lower Hawkesbury (1026) sits above Gunderman (1017).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lower Hawkesbury edges out on average school ICSEA (1026 vs 1017).

Common questionsGunderman vs Lower Hawkesbury

Common questions

Does Gunderman or Lower Hawkesbury have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lower Hawkesbury scores 1026 vs 1017 in Gunderman. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Gunderman
Metric
Lower Hawkesbury

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$251/wk
74.0%
Owner occupied
17.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
189
Population
1,518
54
Median age
53

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
11
1017
Avg ICSEA
1026

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).