Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gunderman vs Laughtondale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Laughtondale has a heavier family-household mix (85% vs 40%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Gunderman
Metric
Laughtondale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$320/wk
74.0%
Owner occupied
74.0%
17.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
189
Population
102
54
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
9
1017
Avg ICSEA
1017

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).