Side by sideSuburb comparison

Hindmarsh Tiers vs Pages Flat.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Pages Flat edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pages Flat (1015) sits above Hindmarsh Tiers (999). Pages Flat skews owner-occupied (89%), Hindmarsh Tiers runs more rental-dense (69% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Pages Flat edges out on average school ICSEA (1015 vs 999). Pages Flat also has a higher family-household share (93% vs 76%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsHindmarsh Tiers vs Pages Flat

Common questions

Does Hindmarsh Tiers or Pages Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pages Flat scores 1015 vs 999 in Hindmarsh Tiers. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Hindmarsh Tiers
Metric
Pages Flat

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$265/wk
69.0%
Owner occupied
89.0%
19.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
111
Population
164
44
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
5
999
Avg ICSEA
1015

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).