Side by sideSuburb comparison

Holder vs Lowbank.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Holder edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Holder (974) sits above Lowbank (971).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Holder edges out on average school ICSEA (974 vs 971). Lowbank also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 81%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsHolder vs Lowbank

Common questions

Does Holder or Lowbank have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Holder scores 974 vs 971 in Lowbank. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Holder
Metric
Lowbank

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$220/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$170/wk
86.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
23.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
123
Population
22
50
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
3
974
Avg ICSEA
971

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).