Huddleston vs Napperby
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Huddleston (946) sits above Napperby (916). Napperby skews owner-occupied (86%), Huddleston runs more rental-dense (30% owner).
Buying in Huddleston or Napperby?
Selling in Huddleston? The free selling guide
Huddleston and Napperby side by side
| Measure | Huddleston | Napperby |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| House rent | – | $350/wk |
| Unit rent | – | $250/wk |
| Owner occupied | 30.0% | 86.0% |
| Renter occupied | – | 9.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 12 | 10 |
| Average ICSEA | 946 | 916 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 23 | 666 |
| Median age | 51 | 44 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 568 mm | 397 mm |
| Mean max, January | 31.1°C | 32.7°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Huddleston edges out on average school ICSEA (946 vs 916).
Huddleston vs Napperby: common questions
Does Huddleston or Napperby have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Huddleston scores 946 vs 916 in Napperby. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Huddleston with
Choosing between Huddleston and Napperby?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.