Jacksons Flat vs Pretty Gully
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pretty Gully (831) sits above Jacksons Flat (783).
Buying in Jacksons Flat or Pretty Gully?
The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guideSelling in Jacksons Flat? The free selling guide
Jacksons Flat and Pretty Gully side by side
| Measure | Jacksons Flat | Pretty Gully |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 100.0% | – |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 2 | 3 |
| Average ICSEA | 783 | 831 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 41 | – |
| Median age | 38 | – |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 927 mm | 1043 mm |
| Mean max, January | 31.1°C | 30.0°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Pretty Gully edges out on average school ICSEA (831 vs 783).
Jacksons Flat vs Pretty Gully: common questions
Does Jacksons Flat or Pretty Gully have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pretty Gully scores 831 vs 783 in Jacksons Flat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Jacksons Flat with
Choosing between Jacksons Flat and Pretty Gully?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.