James Well vs Cunningham

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving James Well (933) sits above Cunningham (932). James Well skews owner-occupied (87%), Cunningham runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

Buying in James Well or Cunningham?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in James Well? The free selling guide

James Well and Cunningham side by side

MeasureJames WellCunningham
Renting
House rent$380/wk–
Unit rent$248/wk–
Owner occupied87.0%59.0%
Renter occupied–14.0%
Schools
Schools nearby43
Average ICSEA933932
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population6378
Median age6635
Climate
Annual rainfall364 mm416 mm
Mean max, January29.2°C29.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
James Well edges out on average school ICSEA (933 vs 932). Cunningham also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 53%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

James Well vs Cunningham: common questions

Does James Well or Cunningham have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), James Well scores 933 vs 932 in Cunningham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.