Side by sideSuburb comparison

Joskeleigh vs Keppel Sands.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Keppel Sands edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Keppel Sands (967) sits above Joskeleigh (958). Joskeleigh skews owner-occupied (95%), Keppel Sands runs more rental-dense (81% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Keppel Sands edges out on average school ICSEA (967 vs 958). Keppel Sands also has a higher family-household share (65% vs 45%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsJoskeleigh vs Keppel Sands

Common questions

Does Joskeleigh or Keppel Sands have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Keppel Sands scores 967 vs 958 in Joskeleigh. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Joskeleigh
Metric
Keppel Sands

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$330/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$330/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$240/wk
95.0%
Owner occupied
81.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
60
Population
374
47
Median age
58

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
5
958
Avg ICSEA
967

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).