Jung vs Rocklands

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Jung (1007) sits above Rocklands (974).

Buying in Jung or Rocklands?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Jung? The free selling guide

Jung and Rocklands side by side

MeasureJungRocklands
Renting
Owner occupied–200.0%
Schools
Schools nearby412
Average ICSEA1007974
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population–25
Median age–48
Climate
Annual rainfall385 mm375 mm
Mean max, January30.6°C30.9°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Jung edges out on average school ICSEA (1007 vs 974).

Jung vs Rocklands: common questions

Does Jung or Rocklands have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Jung scores 1007 vs 974 in Rocklands. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.