Kalamia vs Mcdesme

Kalamia scores higher on walkability (62/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mcdesme (920) sits above Kalamia (914).

Buying in Kalamia or Mcdesme?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Kalamia? The free selling guide

Kalamia and Mcdesme side by side

MeasureKalamiaMcdesme
Renting
Owner occupied–78.0%
Renter occupied–11.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1314
Average ICSEA914920
Lifestyle and people
Walk score620
Transit score00
Bike score250
Population–254
Median age–42
Climate
Annual rainfall899 mm851 mm
Mean max, January31.7°C31.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mcdesme edges out on average school ICSEA (920 vs 914).

Kalamia vs Mcdesme: common questions

Does Kalamia or Mcdesme have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mcdesme scores 920 vs 914 in Kalamia. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Kalamia or Mcdesme?

Kalamia scores 62/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.