Side by sideSuburb comparison
Kamma vs Packers Camp.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.
The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.
The numbers behind the take
Kamma
Metric
Packers Camp
Price & Market
–
Median house
–
–
Median unit
–
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
–
Days on market
–
Rental
$325/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$325/wk
$276/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
–
Owner occupied
73.0%
–
Renter occupied
20.0%
Lifestyle & Demographics
0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
8,623
Population
136
38
Median age
45
Risk & Hazard
–
Flood class
–
–
Bushfire risk
–
Schools
15
Schools nearby
15
927
Avg ICSEA
927
Climate
2065 mm
Annual rainfall
2065 mm
31.5°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.5°C
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Kamma against another suburb