Side by sideSuburb comparison

Katamatite vs Naring.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Katamatite edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Katamatite (967) sits above Naring (959). Katamatite skews owner-occupied (77%), Naring runs more rental-dense (55% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Katamatite edges out on average school ICSEA (967 vs 959). Naring also has a higher family-household share (84% vs 73%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsKatamatite vs Naring

Common questions

Does Katamatite or Naring have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Katamatite scores 967 vs 959 in Naring. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Katamatite
Metric
Naring

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$185/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$210/wk
$185/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
77.0%
Owner occupied
55.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied
8.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
453
Population
122
45
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
13
967
Avg ICSEA
959

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).