Side by sideSuburb comparison

Katherine East vs Lansdowne.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lansdowne edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lansdowne (857) sits above Katherine East (839). Lansdowne skews owner-occupied (70%), Katherine East runs more rental-dense (35% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lansdowne edges out on average school ICSEA (857 vs 839).

Common questionsKatherine East vs Lansdowne

Common questions

Does Katherine East or Lansdowne have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lansdowne scores 857 vs 839 in Katherine East. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Katherine East
Metric
Lansdowne

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$330/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$330/wk
$350/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
35.0%
Owner occupied
70.0%
60.0%
Renter occupied
22.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
3,061
Population
499
30
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
4
839
Avg ICSEA
857

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).