Side by sideSuburb comparison

Katherine vs Katherine South.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Katherine South edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Katherine South scores higher on walkability (6/100 vs 86/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Katherine skews owner-occupied (43%), Katherine South runs more rental-dense (29% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsKatherine vs Katherine South

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Katherine or Katherine South?

Katherine South scores 86/100 on walkability vs 6/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Katherine
Metric
Katherine South

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$330/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$330/wk
$360/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$320/wk
43.0%
Owner occupied
29.0%
49.0%
Renter occupied
62.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

6
Walk score
86
0
Transit score
0
25
Bike score
25
1,254
Population
1,507
34
Median age
33

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
8
839
Avg ICSEA
839

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).