Side by sideSuburb comparison

Keely vs Mcmillans.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mcmillans edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mcmillans (987) sits above Keely (977). Mcmillans skews owner-occupied (70%), Keely runs more rental-dense (41% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mcmillans edges out on average school ICSEA (987 vs 977).

Common questionsKeely vs Mcmillans

Common questions

Does Keely or Mcmillans have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mcmillans scores 987 vs 977 in Keely. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Keely
Metric
Mcmillans

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$183/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$183/wk
$110/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
41.0%
Owner occupied
70.0%
36.0%
Renter occupied
27.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
57
Population
87
44
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
3
977
Avg ICSEA
987

Climate

422 mm
Annual rainfall
422 mm
29.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
29.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).