Your Property Guide

Keith vs Coombe

Keith scores higher on walkability (14/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Keith skews owner-occupied (73%), Coombe runs more rental-dense (45% owner).

Buying in Keith or Coombe?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Keith? The free selling guide

Keith and Coombe side by side

MeasureKeithCoombe
Renting
House rent$350/wk$320/wk
Unit rent$225/wk$250/wk
Owner occupied73.0%45.0%
Renter occupied23.0%32.0%
Schools
Schools nearby22
Average ICSEA984984
Lifestyle and people
Walk score140
Transit score00
Bike score200
Population1,40563
Median age4344
Climate
Annual rainfall436 mm417 mm
Mean max, January30.3°C30.2°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Coombe has a heavier family-household mix (77% vs 64%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Keith vs Coombe: common questions

Which is more walkable, Keith or Coombe?

Keith scores 14/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Keep comparing

Choosing between Keith and Coombe?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide