Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kelvinhaugh vs Oakey.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Kelvinhaugh skews owner-occupied (94%), Oakey runs more rental-dense (62% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

The numbers behind the take

Kelvinhaugh
Metric
Oakey

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$265/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$265/wk
$165/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$265/wk
94.0%
Owner occupied
62.0%
18.0%
Renter occupied
35.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
2
Transit score
0
Bike score
40
49
Population
4,756
38
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
4
921
Avg ICSEA
921

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).