Khosh Bulduk vs Retro
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Retro (942) sits above Khosh Bulduk (932). Khosh Bulduk skews owner-occupied (94%), Retro runs more rental-dense (38% owner).
Buying in Khosh Bulduk or Retro?
Selling in Khosh Bulduk? The free selling guide
Khosh Bulduk and Retro side by side
| Measure | Khosh Bulduk | Retro |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 94.0% | 38.0% |
| Renter occupied | 17.0% | – |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 2 | 5 |
| Average ICSEA | 932 | 942 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 60 | 54 |
| Median age | 45 | 36 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 511 mm | 514 mm |
| Mean max, January | 34.3°C | 34.3°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Retro edges out on average school ICSEA (942 vs 932).
Khosh Bulduk vs Retro: common questions
Does Khosh Bulduk or Retro have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Retro scores 942 vs 932 in Khosh Bulduk. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Khosh Bulduk with
Choosing between Khosh Bulduk and Retro?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.