Kiata vs Nhill
Nhill scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 72/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.
Buying in Kiata or Nhill?
The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guideSelling in Kiata? The free selling guide
Kiata and Nhill side by side
| Measure | Kiata | Nhill |
|---|---|---|
| Price and market | ||
| Median house | – | $203,000 |
| Median unit | – | $126,720 |
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 71.0% | 73.0% |
| Renter occupied | – | 23.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 3 | 3 |
| Average ICSEA | 977 | 977 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 72 |
| Transit score | 0 | 40 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 64 | 2,401 |
| Median age | 51 | 47 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 384 mm | 367 mm |
| Mean max, January | 30.6°C | 30.8°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Nhill has a heavier family-household mix (65% vs 54%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).
Kiata vs Nhill: common questions
Which is more walkable, Kiata or Nhill?
Nhill scores 72/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Kiata with
Choosing between Kiata and Nhill?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.