Kickabil vs Terramungamine
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kickabil (902) sits above Terramungamine (846). Terramungamine skews owner-occupied (85%), Kickabil runs more rental-dense (47% owner).
Buying in Kickabil or Terramungamine?
Selling in Kickabil? The free selling guide
Kickabil and Terramungamine side by side
| Measure | Kickabil | Terramungamine |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| House rent | $600/wk | $600/wk |
| Unit rent | $400/wk | $400/wk |
| Owner occupied | 47.0% | 85.0% |
| Renter occupied | – | 8.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 20 | 2 |
| Average ICSEA | 902 | 846 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 67 | 315 |
| Median age | 39 | 38 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 526 mm | 560 mm |
| Mean max, January | 34.0°C | 33.7°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Kickabil edges out on average school ICSEA (902 vs 846).
Kickabil vs Terramungamine: common questions
Does Kickabil or Terramungamine have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kickabil scores 902 vs 846 in Terramungamine. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Kickabil with
Choosing between Kickabil and Terramungamine?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.