Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kidman Park vs Fulham.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,217,500 and $1,620,000. Kidman Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Kidman Park (median $1,217,500) is roughly 25% cheaper to buy into than Fulham ($1,620,000). Over the past year, Kidman Park (+18.2%) ran 0.4 percentage points ahead of Fulham (+17.8%) on house-price growth.

Kidman Park scores higher on walkability (12/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Fulham (1058) sits above Kidman Park (1057).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Kidman Park is the lower entry point at $1,217,500 median, 25% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Kidman Park carries both higher gross yield (2.93% vs 2.25%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Fulham edges out on average school ICSEA (1058 vs 1057).

Common questionsKidman Park vs Fulham

Common questions

Is Kidman Park or Fulham cheaper to buy in?

Kidman Park has the lower median house price at $1,217,500, roughly 25% below Fulham ($1,620,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Kidman Park or Fulham?

Over the past 12 months, Kidman Park grew +18.2% vs +17.8% in Fulham, a gap of 0.4 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Kidman Park or Fulham have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Fulham scores 1058 vs 1057 in Kidman Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Kidman Park or Fulham?

Kidman Park scores 12/100 on walkability vs 8/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Kidman Park or Fulham?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.93% in Kidman Park vs 2.25% in Fulham. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Kidman Park
Metric
Fulham

Price & Market

$1,217,500
Median house
$1,620,000
$287,280
Median unit
$316,800
+18.2%
Annual growth (house)
+17.8%
Days on market

Rental

$687/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$700/wk
$590/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$500/wk
74.0%
Owner occupied
72.0%
23.0%
Renter occupied
22.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

12
Walk score
8
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
3,874
Population
2,920
44
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1057
Avg ICSEA
1058

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).