Kidman Park vs Underdale.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,217,500 and $1,551,000. Kidman Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Kidman Park (median $1,217,500) is roughly 22% cheaper to buy into than Underdale ($1,551,000). Over the past year, Underdale (+41%) ran 22.8 percentage points ahead of Kidman Park (+18.2%) on house-price growth.
Kidman Park scores higher on walkability (12/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kidman Park (1057) sits above Underdale (1033). Kidman Park skews owner-occupied (74%), Underdale runs more rental-dense (59% owner).
For buyers
Kidman Park is the lower entry point at $1,217,500 median, 22% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Kidman Park delivers the better gross yield (3.03% vs 2.17%), but Underdale has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.
For families
Kidman Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1057 vs 1033). Kidman Park also has a higher family-household share (73% vs 62%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Common questions
Is Kidman Park or Underdale cheaper to buy in?
Kidman Park has the lower median house price at $1,217,500, roughly 22% below Underdale ($1,551,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Which has stronger property growth, Kidman Park or Underdale?
Over the past 12 months, Underdale grew +41% vs +18.2% in Kidman Park, a gap of 22.8 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.
Does Kidman Park or Underdale have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kidman Park scores 1057 vs 1033 in Underdale. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Kidman Park or Underdale?
Kidman Park scores 12/100 on walkability vs 8/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
Which suburb has higher rental yield, Kidman Park or Underdale?
Gross rental yield on houses is 3.03% in Kidman Park vs 2.17% in Underdale. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Kidman Park against another suburb