Your Property Guide

Kiels Mountain vs Forest Glen

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Forest Glen (1050) sits above Kiels Mountain (1049).

Buying in Kiels Mountain or Forest Glen?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Kiels Mountain? The free selling guide

Kiels Mountain and Forest Glen side by side

MeasureKiels MountainForest Glen
Renting
Owner occupied86.0%–
Renter occupied9.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA10491050
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score2065
Population714–
Median age43–
Climate
Annual rainfall1597 mm1597 mm
Mean max, January29.4°C29.4°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Forest Glen edges out on average school ICSEA (1050 vs 1049).

Kiels Mountain vs Forest Glen: common questions

Does Kiels Mountain or Forest Glen have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Forest Glen scores 1050 vs 1049 in Kiels Mountain. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Keep comparing

Choosing between Kiels Mountain and Forest Glen?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide