Kilgariff vs Flynn

Kilgariff scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

Buying in Kilgariff or Flynn?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Kilgariff? The free selling guide

Kilgariff and Flynn side by side

MeasureKilgariffFlynn
Renting
House rent$250/wk$328/wk
Unit rent$202/wk$90/wk
Owner occupied56.0%–
Renter occupied40.0%90.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1616
Average ICSEA884884
Lifestyle and people
Walk score20
Transit score00
Bike score30100
Population551119
Median age4230
Climate
Annual rainfall277 mm286 mm
Mean max, January37.0°C36.9°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Flynn has a heavier family-household mix (90% vs 74%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Kilgariff vs Flynn: common questions

Which is more walkable, Kilgariff or Flynn?

Kilgariff scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.