Side by sideSuburb comparison

Killabakh vs Cedar Party.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cedar Party edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cedar Party (943) sits above Killabakh (925). Killabakh skews owner-occupied (99%), Cedar Party runs more rental-dense (86% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cedar Party edges out on average school ICSEA (943 vs 925).

Common questionsKillabakh vs Cedar Party

Common questions

Does Killabakh or Cedar Party have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cedar Party scores 943 vs 925 in Killabakh. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Killabakh
Metric
Cedar Party

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$245/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$295/wk
99.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied
8.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
248
Population
379
57
Median age
57

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

17
Schools nearby
5
925
Avg ICSEA
943

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).