Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kincora vs Pampas.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Pampas scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kincora (964) sits above Pampas (940).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kincora edges out on average school ICSEA (964 vs 940).

Common questionsKincora vs Pampas

Common questions

Does Kincora or Pampas have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kincora scores 964 vs 940 in Pampas. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Kincora or Pampas?

Pampas scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Kincora
Metric
Pampas

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$270/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$360/wk
$245/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$243/wk
41.0%
Owner occupied
50.0%
33.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
2
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
71
Population
78
44
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
3
964
Avg ICSEA
940

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).