Side by sideSuburb comparison

King Scrub vs Dayboro.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Dayboro edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Dayboro scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 12/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsKing Scrub vs Dayboro

Common questions

Which is more walkable, King Scrub or Dayboro?

Dayboro scores 12/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

King Scrub
Metric
Dayboro

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$385/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$385/wk
$360/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$410/wk
84.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied
9.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
12
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
5
363
Population
2,376
40
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
1048
Avg ICSEA
1048

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).