Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kingston On Murray vs Woolpunda.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Woolpunda edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Woolpunda (947) sits above Kingston On Murray (922). Kingston On Murray skews owner-occupied (82%), Woolpunda runs more rental-dense (33% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Woolpunda edges out on average school ICSEA (947 vs 922). Kingston On Murray also has a higher family-household share (74% vs 44%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsKingston On Murray vs Woolpunda

Common questions

Does Kingston On Murray or Woolpunda have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Woolpunda scores 947 vs 922 in Kingston On Murray. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kingston On Murray
Metric
Woolpunda

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
82.0%
Owner occupied
33.0%
17.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
312
Population
16
53
Median age
58

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
15
922
Avg ICSEA
947

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).