Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kirknie vs Fredericksfield.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kirknie edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kirknie (920) sits above Fredericksfield (912). Fredericksfield skews owner-occupied (80%), Kirknie runs more rental-dense (58% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kirknie edges out on average school ICSEA (920 vs 912). Fredericksfield also has a higher family-household share (78% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsKirknie vs Fredericksfield

Common questions

Does Kirknie or Fredericksfield have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kirknie scores 920 vs 912 in Fredericksfield. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kirknie
Metric
Fredericksfield

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$113/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$163/wk
58.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
70
Population
259
36
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

19
Schools nearby
4
920
Avg ICSEA
912

Climate

1036 mm
Annual rainfall
1036 mm
31.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).