Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kirrama vs Warrami.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Warrami edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Warrami (881) sits above Kirrama (793).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Warrami edges out on average school ICSEA (881 vs 793). Kirrama also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 59%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsKirrama vs Warrami

Common questions

Does Kirrama or Warrami have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Warrami scores 881 vs 793 in Kirrama. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kirrama
Metric
Warrami

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$225/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$90/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
Owner occupied
24.0%
Renter occupied
18.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
3
Population
39
46
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
5
793
Avg ICSEA
881

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).