Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kooba vs Calorafield.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Calorafield edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Calorafield (938) sits above Kooba (933).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Calorafield edges out on average school ICSEA (938 vs 933).

Common questionsKooba vs Calorafield

Common questions

Does Kooba or Calorafield have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Calorafield scores 938 vs 933 in Kooba. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kooba
Metric
Calorafield

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$185/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$213/wk
67.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
39
Population
10,687
49
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
20
933
Avg ICSEA
938

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).