Side by sideSuburb comparison

Koonya vs Taranna.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Taranna edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Taranna scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Taranna has a heavier family-household mix (66% vs 52%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsKoonya vs Taranna

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Koonya or Taranna?

Taranna scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Koonya
Metric
Taranna

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$115/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$210/wk
$115/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$210/wk
88.0%
Owner occupied
93.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
2
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
138
Population
167
61
Median age
59

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
11
940
Avg ICSEA
940

Climate

586 mm
Annual rainfall
586 mm
21.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
21.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).