Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kooreh vs Logan.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kooreh edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kooreh (981) sits above Logan (967). Kooreh skews owner-occupied (125%), Logan runs more rental-dense (74% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kooreh edges out on average school ICSEA (981 vs 967). Kooreh also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 52%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsKooreh vs Logan

Common questions

Does Kooreh or Logan have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kooreh scores 981 vs 967 in Logan. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kooreh
Metric
Logan

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$185/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$178/wk
$157/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
125.0%
Owner occupied
74.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
29
Population
59
43
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
981
Avg ICSEA
967

Climate

422 mm
Annual rainfall
422 mm
29.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
29.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).