Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kunjin vs Corrigin.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Corrigin edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Corrigin scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 36/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Corrigin skews owner-occupied (68%), Kunjin runs more rental-dense (47% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kunjin has a heavier family-household mix (93% vs 60%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsKunjin vs Corrigin

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Kunjin or Corrigin?

Corrigin scores 36/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Kunjin
Metric
Corrigin

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$183/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$183/wk
$100/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$185/wk
47.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
27.0%
Renter occupied
25.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
36
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
15
48
Population
701
34
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
3
994
Avg ICSEA
994

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).